Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: xclusive: Neither Michael Jackson or Debbie Rowe is The biological Parents!!

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Wide (rest of width)
Narrow (200px)
MZ Guru
Status: Offline
Posts: 1408
Date:

xclusive: Neither Michael Jackson or Debbie Rowe is The biological Parents!!

TMZ just report's Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the w****.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the birth tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the babies up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.

UPDATE:

We've learned Michael Jackson never adopted his three children, even though he's not the biological father.

TMZ broke the story that neither Jackson nor Debbie Rowe are the biological parents of Michael Jr. and Paris. And Michael was not the biological parent of Prince Michael II either.

Now here's the rub. We've learned Jackson never filed legal papers to adopt any of his children. Legal experts tell us Jackson would be presumed the father but it's not conclusive by any means.

As for why Jackson didn't formally adopt -- we're told at the time the kids were born there was no third party whom he believed would try and claim custody. For some reason, Jackson never thought Debbie Rowe would mount a custody challenge.



__________________
...I R D BASS....I R D BLUDCLAWW BASS
*~*~ MZJ ELECT ~*~*
Status: Offline
Posts: 14230
Date:
and the circus continues..... a wonda if BABY read this 1 yet

__________________

 

IF A SO THEN A SO........
f3608-1.gif

MZ Super Veteran
Status: Offline
Posts: 4603
Date:
MZ Life Time Super G/\Z/\ Member
Status: Offline
Posts: 26023
Date:
eeehhh dem a ffi prove dis


__________________

PrettyAzz Pink'
Status: Offline
Posts: 3439
Date:
THIS GETTIN MORE, MORE , FUNKY AYE: DOES IT MATTA....bless MJ GEESH-IVONNA

__________________

***MZ Hotness***
Status: Offline
Posts: 4589
Date:
micheal isnt the father but debbie rowe is the mother it has been confirmed

__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2cnv1ud.jpg

PrettyAzz Pink'
Status: Offline
Posts: 3439
Date:
sad

__________________

MDZJA.....BAREFACE.....MDZJA
Status: Offline
Posts: 4881
Date:
b*m*oklaat

__________________

If you think education's expensive, try ignorance
sigpic59898_6gif.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.