u need a wicked tv to tell di diff but blue-ray is better and more expensive while high def is still wicked but not as great a quality as the blueray but cheaper wid more brands to choose from
both a dem show good put it this way first there was cassette now wi have dvd we don't even use video no more and a DVD player is quite cheap now a days so basically what mi sey is to me it don't matter which one shows better what will matter us which one is more dominant on the market...
blu ray betta, HD use orange lazer. Di blue lazor av a smalla wave length, so is like dem a write smaller pan di same amount a space, so dem get fi write more tings. blu ray av a extra 10 Gig ova HD so dem use di extra storage fi a higher bit and sample rate.(and a tink dem di eye closer so di light spread less)
blu ray betta, HD use orange lazer. Di blue lazor av a smalla wave length, so is like dem a write smaller pan di same amount a space, so dem get fi write more tings. blu ray av a extra 10 Gig ova HD so dem use di extra storage fi a higher bit and sample rate.(and a tink dem di eye closer so di light spread less)
unu fool how d hell hi def mus b better blue ray have 25gig on one side and if i read correctly most of them are dual layered, the reason y these movies dont look as good on dvd is simply because they have to b compressed so the more space a sidk has the less compression is needed in blu rays's case NO COMPRESSION 50gig in total
wikaman wah u dont kno u leave alone how a disk ago use wavelengths dem tings deh a fi radio and other invisible data carriers in the air not a tangible piece of hardware
__________________
Nado Rankx ------- G S P --------------------------------------------- OOOOOOOO so a dat a gwan Watch yuh self